![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
IVR
Accessibility Forum Americans
with Disabilities Act
OVERVIEW
OF THE TITLES II AND III OF The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability by private employers (Title I), state and local governments (Title II), and places of public accommodation (Title III). Title IV of the ADA also requires common carriers nationwide to provide telecommunications relay services. In 1991, the Department of Justice promulgated rules interpreting the nondiscrimination mandates of Titles II and III to require effective communication with individuals with disabilities (28 C.F.R. Parts 35 and 36). This obligation extended to both state and local governments and places of public accommodation. A public accommodation is defined as a private entity, whose operations affect commerce and which falls within one of twelve categories: 1. places
of lodging, such as hotels and motels At the time that the ADA was passed, interactive voice response systems were just beginning to proliferate. Now, however, these systems are ubiquitous; nearly all places of public accommodation and state and local governments use IVR menus for some, if not most, of their telephone services. Original rules promulgated by the U.S. Department of Justice provided that relay services could be used by TTY users to contact places of public accommodations for routine appointments, reservations, and inquiries. However, often relay services are unable to type fast enough to convey information contained in an IVR message and respond back within the time given for selecting prompts from that message. The many problems with using relay services for IVR systems were articulated by the FCC in a Public Notice released in September of 2000: [R]elay service does not provide consumers with a hearing or speech disability the ability to engage in communication by wire or radio in a manner that is functionally equivalent to those consumers without such a disability when the communication encounters an interactive menu. We are concerned . . . that individuals with disabilities are being excluded from access to these ubiquitous technologies. . . . Interactive menu systems and recorded messages are increasingly used by businesses and services. They present substantial barriers to TRS users because the speed at which information is provided is too fast to allow the TRS user to respond within the system response time. As a result, TRS users are either unable to make calls that encounter interactive menus or other recorded messages or must frequently place a success of calls to leave a message with, or access the information provided by, such systems. State and local governments and places of public accommodation that now use IVR systems need to comply with the mandates of Titles II and III of the ADA to provide an effective means of telephone communication for individuals with disabilities who are unable to access their IVR systems. In addition to presenting access barriers to relay users, IVR systems create barriers for other groups of individuals, including individuals who are hard of hearing, blind, cognitively delayed or individuals who have motor disabilities. There are a number of ways that entities covered under the ADA can provide telephone access when they use IVR systems: ·
They may purchase and use accessible IVR systems manufactured in compliance
with Section 255. Use of an IVR system that permits individuals to delay
prompts or the time needed to respond to those prompts would provide access
to individuals with disabilities who need more time to respond. ·
They may provide an alternative telephone number for a live voice operator
so that relay callers and other individuals with disabilities are able
to speak directly to that live person. *************************************************** In 1996, Congress added Section 255 to the Communications Act. Section 255 requires manufacturers of telecommunications equipment and customer premises equipment to ensure that their equipment is designed, developed and fabricated to be accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable. Providers of telecommunications services have a similar requirement to ensure that their services are accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities, if readily achievable. If it is determined that making a product or service accessible and usable by individuals with disabilities is not readily achievable, then the manufacturer or service provider must ensure that the equipment or service is "compatible with existing peripheral devices or specialized CPE commonly used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access." In September of 1999, the Commission issued rules implementing Section 255. These rules, effective since January 28, 2000, can be found at 47 C.F.R. Parts 6 and 7. The rules make clear that all basic and adjunct-to-basic telecommunications services and all telecommunications products are covered under Section 255. In addition, these rules brought two information services, voice mail and interactive voice response (IVR) systems, within the scope of Section 255. ACCESSIBLE BY The FCC's rules provide a detailed list of what service providers and manufacturers must consider when trying to make products and services to be accessible. When considering whether it is readily achievable to make interactive menu services and equipment accessible, all of the following items should be reviewed (47 C.F.R § 7.3(a)): (1) Input, control, and mechanical functions shall be locatable, identifiable, and operable in accordance with each of the following, assessed independently: (i) Operable without
vision. Provide at least one mode that does not require user vision. (2) All information necessary to operate and use the product, including but not limited to, text, static or dynamic images, icons, labels, sounds, or incidental operating cues, comply with each of the following, assessed independently: (i) Availability of
visual information. Provide visual information through at least one mode
in auditory form. Service providers and manufacturers must also evaluate whether the products and services they produce are "usable by" individuals with disabilities. The Commission defines this as having "access to the full functionality and documentation for the product, including instructions, product information, (including accessible feature information), documentation, bills, and technical support which is provided to individuals without disabilities." This mandate requires providers and manufacturers to provide end-user product documentation in alternate formats (such as Braille and large print) or alternate modes (TTY, e-mail etc.) upon request,; to provide access to repair services, technical hotlines and databases, and to ensure usable customer support and technical support in call centers and service centers. These various forms of access must be made available to consumers at no additional charge. The Commission has also stated that "usable by" requires manufacturers and service providers to include consumers with disabilities in research projects, focus groups, and products trials. In addition, when developing, or incorporating existing training programs, manufacturers and service providers shall consider the accessibility requirements of individuals with disabilities; the means of communicating with individuals with disabilities; how products and services are currently accessible, and commonly used adaptive technology used with the manufacturer's products. COMPATIBLE BY When it is not readily
achievable to make a product or service accessible, the product or service
must be compatible with existing peripheral devices or specialized customer
premises equipment, if providing such compatibility is readily achievable.
Peripheral devices are devices that translate or otherwise transform telecommunications
into a form that is accessible to individuals with disabilities. Examples
are TTYs, visual signaling devices, and amplifiers. Specialized customer
premises equipment (SCPE) is equipment, used on the premises of a person
to originate, route, or terminate telecommunications, which is commonly
used by individuals with disabilities to achieve access. For example,
direct-connect TTYs are considered SCPE that must be accessible under
the Section 255 mandates. The rules make clear that assistive technology
devices such as hearing aids or eyeglasses, which have a broad application
outside the telecommunications context, even if used in conjunction with
peripheral equipment or SCPE, are not peripheral equipment or SCPE. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 also added Section 251(a)(2) to the Communications Act. This section prohibits telecommunications carriers from installing network features, functions, or capabilities that do not comply with the guidelines or standards established pursuant to Section 255. The Commission explains that this means telecommunications carriers must not install service logic and databases associated with routing telecommunications services, whether residing in hardware or software, that do not comply with the accessibility requirements of its rules. READILY ACHIEVABLE Companies are required to make their products and services accessible to and usable by people with disabilities, only if it is "readily achievable" to do so. In determining what is readily achievable, companies must consider the cost of the access needed, the nature of the access, and the resources of the company. For the most part, the readily achievable analysis requires a balancing of the burden of providing access with the available resources of the company covered by Section 255. Access features which would so fundamentally alter a product that they would reduce substantially the functionality of the product or substantially deter use of the product by other individuals, are not likely to be readily achievable. Similarly, companies do not need to incorporate access features which are not technically possible. Companies wishing to use any of these defenses must provide evidence to back up their assertions. *************************************************** In 1998, Congress strengthened Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act to require Federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities. Section 508 requires all Federal agencies to procure, maintain, and use electronic and information technology that is accessible to (1) federal employees with disabilities, and (2) individuals with disabilities outside the federal government who need government information, unless doing so would impose an undue burden on the agency. Under Section 508, agencies must give employees and members of the public who have disabilities access to information that is comparable to the access available to others. Section 508
is overseen by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (also called the Access Board). To assist with procuring accessible
technologies, the Access Board issued specific technical requirements,
which went into effect in June of 2001. Federal agencies must now use
the Access Board's guidelines to revise their own policies for procuring
and using electronic and information technology. The Access
Board's guidelines cover interactive voice response systems. The following
are a few of the guidelines that may have some application to these systems: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||